Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Op-Ed Contributor

Why Democrats Should Work With Trump

WASHINGTON — President Trump has discovered that trying to work with Republicans, like trying to work on health care policy, is complicated. So with all his big campaign pledges in limbo following last week’s Obamacare fiasco, he reportedly is contemplating overtures to a party that actually wants to govern: the Democrats.

This new tack comes, mind you, after Mr. Trump blamed Democrats for refusing to help him and House Speaker Paul Ryan eviscerate Obamacare. With zero support from Democrats, the pair had no margin for error as Republicans started to defect and were forced to pull their bill.

Perhaps it’s beginning to dawn on the president that today’s Republican Party is designed for maximal obstruction and minimal constructive policy making. The rigidly doctrinaire Freedom Caucus essentially has veto power over White House initiatives, while moderates will jump ship if Mr. Trump concedes too much to right-wing purists.

What’s more, Republicans are all over the map on the next big items on Mr. Trump’s agenda — tax reform and infrastructure. So even though Republicans control Congress and the White House, Washington’s new political math suggests that Mr. Trump may have no choice but to reach out to Democrats.

Image
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, center, at a news conference last week in Washington.Credit...Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

If he could peel off several dozen moderate Democrats in the House and a handful in the Senate, he could neutralize the far right’s naysaying and give moderate Republicans a chance to vote for measures with broad, bipartisan support.

If Mr. Trump does turn to Democrats, how should they respond?

“Hell, no” will most likely be the first response. Under pressure from their base, congressional leaders are dug in for years of unremitting resistance. They’ve even issued orders to Democrats on tax-writing committees not to produce a reform blueprint of their own, lest they be tempted to talk turkey with the White House.

All this is understandable, given the ugly and dishonest campaign Mr. Trump waged and what most Democrats still regard as his obvious unfitness for the office he now holds. Yet hold it he does — and if he’s willing to make real concessions to their party’s core values and priorities, pragmatic Democrats should hear him out.

Unlike depriving millions of Americans of health insurance, revamping America’s outdated tax code and modernizing our run-down infrastructure are progressive causes Democrats should be for. And unlike Republicans, whose ideological rigidity and strident partisanship often border on nihilism, Democrats still hew to the quaint notion that the people elected them to solve problems, not prevent them from being solved. McConnellism is not in the party’s DNA.

But if moderate Democrats are disposed to cooperate with the deal-maker in chief, they ought to exact a high price. On tax reform, for example, they should insist that Mr. Trump deliver tax relief to the middle class, not the wealthy, and that he jettison Mr. Ryan’s proposed border-adjustment tax, which would hit consumers and business with big price hikes. The administration needs to find better ways to pay for a sharp reduction in the corporate tax rate. Democrats don’t have to love big business to recognize that our antiquated tax system forces companies to pay much higher taxes than their overseas competitors. That makes American workers less competitive and gives our companies incentives to move investment abroad — and keep profits there — to avoid the higher rate.

Some die-hard Republican supply-siders would gladly abandon Mr. Ryan and simply add the cost of Mr. Trump’s enormous tax cut to the federal deficit. Democrats ought to hold their feet to the fiscal fire. One way is to close loopholes that cost hundreds of billions in lost revenue and, most economists believe, distort investment decisions. Another is to cap the value of tax deductions (as President Obama proposed) so that high-income people would receive no more tax relief than anyone else. More ambitiously, Democrats could go where Mr. Ryan apparently feared to go by proposing a consumption tax that has actually been tried and proved effective around the world — the value-added tax, with adjustments to ensure progressivity.

Democrats should also insist that Mr. Trump put new revenue on the table, specifically an economywide carbon tax. Otherwise, it will be difficult if not impossible to finance both a comprehensive tax overhaul and the nation-building infrastructure push Mr. Trump has promised. According to the Harvard economist Joe Aldy, a $25-per-ton carbon tax going up 5 percent a year could raise from $130 to $200 billion a year by 2030. Crucially for Democrats, it would also provide a powerful, market-based alternative for the Clean Power Plan and other regulatory policies for lowering carbon emissions that Mr. Trump and the Republicans want to scuttle.

Finally, pro-growth Democrats should be prepared to work with the White House to pass a major boost in spending on roads, air and seaports, railways, water systems, a “smart” electrical grid and other public goods that can support more robust economic innovation and investment. In return, they should demand that it’s actually funded, and that a significant share target people and communities left behind by changing technology and globalization.

Would Mr. Trump accept Democrats’ help on these terms? If he really wants to start racking up “wins” for his voters, he would. He’d have to share credit — a novel experience — with Democrats, who’d get points from swing voters for being pragmatic and competent. And they wouldn’t be constrained from fiercely opposing Mr. Trump on just about everything else.

If Democrats have a chance to help average working families and show they’re not obstructionists, they should take it. America doesn’t need two parties of no.

Will Marshall is the president and founder of the Progressive Policy Institute.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTOpinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 31 of the New York edition with the headline: We Don’t Need Another Party of ‘No’. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT